Reserve Component (RC)
Pre-Structure M a nning
Decision Review (SMDR)
Overview
Purpose
Provide an overview of the
RC Pre-SMDR process and
how it came to resolution.
Outline
^Project's Background
> Previous Process Overview
>RC Pre-SMDR Process
Overview
> Detailed View of the Process
> ODCSED/TIE Responsibilities
> Benefits
Project's Background
Project conceived from the TASS CoC (Sep
2000) as a DCSED RTCC Pilot Test (use of
VTC and other online technologies) for TIE
Jackson
RTCC Pilot Test metamorphosed into current
project 14 Dec 2000
Project became a collaborated effort between
USARC and NGB with ODCSED assuming the
role as a facilitator /project manager
Developed a MOA formalizing this process
and established a common terminology
Previous Process
Overview
Training Workshop (As Requested)
OCT
SEP
RC Pre-SMDR Process
Overview
Training Workshop (As Requested)
TRAP 3 WTRAP 1 TRAP 2
TACITS RTCC NTCC
SMDR ,
OCT
SEP
Input Phase
CWTRAP/
RTCC
EVAL
Phase
NTCC
TRAP 2
Input Phase
22 JAN - 23 APR 01
DCSED/Prononei
it
E
School Review
ndstate: CAD
is verified
(22 JAN - 9 MAR)
Q
uota Manage
r
R
Input
idstate:
efine Projection
s
(12 - 26 MAR)
School Input
E ndstate:
^Unconstrained
Capability
Identified
(27 MAR - 10 AP
USARC / NGB
Evalu ation
Endstate: Identification
of users who failed to input
their data and any
requiring training
(11-23 APR)
Consolidated Working Training
Resources Arbitration Panel /
Regional Training Coordination
Conference (WTRAP/RTCC)
• Combination of TRNG Workshop, WTRAP
1 and RTCC
• Minimal TDY, if participant does inputs
CWTRAP/RTCC
continued
DAY 0
• Mandatory attendance for all Quota Managers
and CA/LD School house representatives that failed
to update data for CWTRAP/RTCC and/or who
require training
DAY 1
• CA/LD execute 1 st TRAP TY02
• Mandatory attendance for all C S/CSS School
house representatives that failed to update data for
CWTRAP/RTCC and/or who require training
CWTRAP/RTCC
continued
DAY 2
• C S/CSS execute 1 st TRAP TY02
• Continued mandatory attendance for all CA/LD
School house representatives that failed to update
data for CWTRAP/RTCC and/or who require
training
DAY 3
•CA/LD execute RTCC TY05 and update TY04.
Users initiate issue paper on constrained courses
and/or draft cross component resource
documents. NGB/USARC team has all documents
prior to releasing any CA/LD participants.
• Continued mandatory attendance for all C S/CSS
School house representatives that failed to update
_ j r nTATTTn Ar\ /■nrn/^/n / i_ •
CWTRAP/RTCC
continued
DAY 4
• CS/CSS execute RTCC TY05 and update TY04.
Users initiate issue paper on constrained courses
and/or draft cross component resource
documents. NGB/USARC team has all documents
prior to releasing any CS/CSS participants.
Evaluation /
Coordination Phase
21 MAY - 13 JUL 01
NGB / USARC Evaluation and
Coordina tion
Endstate: All possible constrained
courses are unconstrained prior to
NTCC
Method: USARC and NGB evaluated
all constrained courses and
coordinated to resolve courses first
within region then to regions with
additional capacity
National Training
Coordination Conference
(NTCC) Modifications
16 - 20 JUL 01
Work only constrained and potential
problem courses (proponent school
representative briefs potential
problems)
Endstate: All possible constrained
courses are unconstrained prior to the
SMDR
Method: Requirements are moved to
other regions with existing capability;
cross component resourcing documents
are signed; all issue papers are
ODCSED / TIE
Responsibilities
ODCSED
• Coordinate Instructor to Student Ratio (ISR)
update within CAD
• Host NTCC (reserve facilities, publish MOI)
• Prepare AAR distribute to NGB, USARC, TIEs
TIE
•_Host CWTRAP/RTCC (reserve directed facilities,
publish Admin MOI)
• Perform duties as recorder during
CWTRAP/RTCC
• Prepare AAR distribute to ODCSED, NGB,
USARC
Benefits
Streamlines the current system by
combining current WTAP #1 and RTCC
Provides a standardized yearly training
program hosted by NGB and USARC
Allows participants to maintain focus
from WTRAP to RTCC
Reduces TDY cost and NGB/USARC
OPTEMPO
Continues to reinforce regional
teamwork and coordination
MOA formalizes process
Questions / Concerns